Revamp Your Next Summative with UDL and Empower Multilingual Learners

The majority of our students are emergent multilingual learners with varying English language proficiency levels from China, Korea, Japan, Spain and Israel. In our Language Acquisition English class, we wanted to ensure student voice and choice were at the forefront of our planning process when applying the UDL framework. We started with identifying barriers, preferences, and needs of our students. 

Our original Unit 2 summative assessment was a written opinion review about a text of the teachers’ choice. We found that many of our summative tasks were automatically representing dominant English-speaking cultures, not the cultures we work with. After gathering data about student language proficiency, background knowledge, learning preferences, we re-designed the summative task to include student voice and choice. Students had the option to choose from multilingual articles, songs, movies, podcasts, videos, or documentaries to write their reviews in English. The original lesson plan’s barrier was that students all had to write a movie review based on a movie (in English) we would all watch in class. This didn’t allow any choice at all, since some students might have preferred to read or listen to something rather than just watching a movie and writing a review about it. 

Another barrier we considered was the limited and interrupted education due to COVID and/or the nature of a highly-transient international school setting where families move often. Some students have difficulty with school culture, attendance, classroom expectations, cultural differences, limited literacy, and writing skills in home language, many have been long term language learners which causes fatigue, many have mastered social language (only BICS) but struggle with CALP (academic). 

We applied CRT (culturally responsive teaching) to activate prior knowledge and participation styles to make instruction more relevant and accessible. We wanted to make content more personally meaningful and easier to master which required us to focus on our students' assets and make tasks more learner-centered. 

What we are working on is making a clear connection between culture and cognition. We are passionate to guide students to success by building upon their cultural, linguistic, and language skills. We clearly defined content and language goals for Unit 2 and the summative task, focusing on specific language domains such as reading, writing, speaking, and listening. We planned backwards to ensure students had multiple opportunities to engage in a variety of personalized methods and materials to suit their individual language learning needs. 

We primarily focused on activating students' prior knowledge with a visible thinking routine, targeted specific skills selected based on language proficiency data, provided meaningful and relevant instruction by integrating reading, writing, speaking, and listening practice. We heavily focused on students’ assets by promoting cross-linguistic features and transfer skills to encourage translanguaging. Some strategies we embedded in our daily lessons that led up to the summative assessment were: sufficient wait time, activating background knowledge, providing scaffolds with visuals and manipulatives, vocabulary building, using gradual release model, and multiple opportunities to review, repeat, and practice. 

Changing the summative and adding choice completely changed the way we viewed our unit. We plan to apply this learning process and our summative process as a template for future learning engagements. 

Continue your learning. Explore our guide to Universal Design for Learning.