Here is the deal with science: it is ever-evolving. I mean, after all, if science did not advance we’d still be sending our “texts” via carrier pigeon, rather than on the latest iPhone.
Google defines rocket science as “the scientific study of building and using rockets; something that is very difficult to learn or understand.” Learning to read is like rocket science; there’s a lot to it. And thanks to the advancement of MRIs (yup, the kind that scan you to see what is going on inside your body!) we can pinpoint what happens in the brains of efficient and struggling readers. This information contributes to the growing body of research coined the science of reading (SOR), an evidence-based approach to teaching reading that emphasizes the importance of explicit and systematic instruction in phonological awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. This research also helps educators better understand how the brain processes language, which can be used to improve reading instruction. One thing we do know is that the brain is hardwired to acquire language naturally, but not reading.
Reading is a complex cognitive process that involves the interaction of many different skills. In the past century, there have been numerous theories and practices that have aimed to help all students learn to read. Popular approaches have included whole language, balanced literacy, and phonics. If you have been teaching for a while, you may have experienced all of these approaches. Now, luckily, we know what works best for the majority of learners. Research has shown that a comprehensive approach that incorporates phonics is the most effective way to teach reading. As with learning any new concept or skill, there will always be variability so be sure to reference data and student outcomes to make instructional decisions while using evidence-based practices.
Some educators may struggle to teach reading with fidelity, using the science of reading, while also incorporating Universal Design for Learning (UDL). These two bodies of research are not in conflict. It is not only possible but beneficial to support reading instruction with “firm goals and flexible means.” Educators can support expert learning, remove barriers, and offer options for accessing learning while implementing strategies that teach sounds and reading rules. The connection between UDL and the SOR lies in their shared goal of promoting equitable access to literacy instruction for all learners. Specifically:
The full body of research known as SOR is massive and can feel overwhelming for practicing teachers, so let’s use one of the UDL checkpoints (Checkpoint 3.2:Highlight patterns, critical features, big ideas, and relationships) and highlight the focal points in the Science of Reading.
In conclusion, the Science of Reading and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) share a common goal of promoting equitable access to literacy instruction for all learners. As our understanding of the science of reading continues to evolve, it is essential to stay up-to-date with the latest research and best practices, and continually reflect on the impact of those practices on ALL scholars, to ensure that all learners have the opportunity to develop strong reading skills. And remember we must be committed to being lifelong learners ourselves. We may have evolved to sending texts via iPhones and Androids, but when we eventually advance to sending messages via laser beams we don’t want to be left behind, stay informed!
Resources
CAST (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org